"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty." ~Thomas Jefferson

Who's to blame?

Limited government activists will have to acknowledge two, simple facts before they are fully empowered to institute any effective reforms of government.  More on these two facts in a moment, but let's look at an explanatory example.

There has been much coverage of the solar company Solyndra.  The bankruptcy of that "alternative energy" company has cost taxpayers a half a billion dollars.  Worse yet, other alternative energy companies have, or are about to, go bankrupt as well burning many more hundreds of millions of valuable taxpayer dollars.  But who is to blame for this massive failure?

Sure, it is quite easy to blame statist President Obama.  Or the "Democrats".  Or even "liberals" or "environemental whackos".  But is that just an easy way to blame the 'other team' or are there deeper, systemic problems that have created these situations?

Where was the firm, vocal opposition to these programs before they produced these failures?  How many members of both 'teams' supported legislation that created these programs?  Take the 100 watt lightbulb ban that just recently took effect.  That legislation was approved by a Republican House and signed into law by George W. Bush.  It wasn't only Democrats who bought into the man-made global warming myth and enacted Big Government programs and "solutions".

Such programs and efforts do not only take place with federal programs.  Many states and even local government entities, including school districts, are embracing and implementing such "alternative energy" programs at great cost to taxpayers.

The two facts that limited government activists must acknowledge, or they shall remain powerless to effect any real reforms, are:

1)  Politicians of both parties are responsible for Big Government statist solutions and erosions of liberty; and

2)  Such actions are occurring at all levels of government, not just the federal level.

As long as we continue to support one team, merely to defeat another, or remain focused on candidates and elections as the "solution", nothing will change.  We must set higher expectations and establish new rules for the political class.

Here is a blog from Keystone Liberty which explains policies enacted, and considered for expansion, by the Pennsylvania General Assembly, which is currently Republican controlled:

Scrap Solar Subsidies

In recent years, Harrisburg politicians decided that Pennsylvania would play venture capitalist in the solar energy market. In an attempt to attract green jobs, the Commonwealth extended more than $180 million in loans and grants to develop solar panel production. Subsidies were so successful in creating an artificial market that solar energy credits completely collapsed in value leaving a surplus of solar panels. A Republican representative has decided to sponsor legislation to salvage the solar industry through more subsidies. This legislation defies the principles of limited government and free markets. Additionally, the legislation is projected to increase costs for both energy consumers and taxpayers.

Clearly the government caused the boom and bust of the solar market. The push by the Republican lawmaker for increased government intervention in this arena is ill-advised. The considered legislation is anticipated to cost Pennsylvania energy consumers more than $3 billion over the next decade and will prove costly to the taxpayer as well. Interestingly, ideological roles seemed to be reversed as the Democratic committee chair stands in opposition to the plan for increased solar subsidies. Despite Gov. Corbett’s objections, the Republican’s legislation has garnered enough co-sponsors in the House to pass. The legislation requires utility companies to triple their use of solar power by 2013. Over the course of the next decade, Pennsylvania’s Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards Act of 2004 requires that 18 percent of all energy sources from renewables.

The stringent mandates from the 2004 legislation and the current solar rescue package will be detrimental to the state’s already stagnate economy. The government sponsorship of solar and renewable energies diminishes the purchasing power of Pennsylvanians. Residential and commercial energy users will be coerced into paying more for their energy. The government is directly picking winners and losers in the economy as they buttress one sector at the expense of competing energy producers. Harrisburg’s mandates must be repealed as they are in opposition to free market competition which fosters innovation.

Providing more subsidies to fix an already distressed solar market is not the solution. There is another method to attract the green industry to Pennsylvania without imposing costly energy mandates on Keystone residents. By implementing policies to improve Pennsylvania’s business climate, policymakers can entice investment for not only green jobs, but all industries. Tax reform accompanied with a right-to-work law would be a catalyst to increase Pennsylvania’s economic competitiveness.

The government must stop playing venture capitalist with taxpayer money. Pennsylvanians should be given the opportunity to utilize the most affordable energy source. The Commonwealth is very fortunate to have an immense amount of coal and natural gas. These natural resources need to be part of the state’s energy portfolio for the future. Tremendous innovations have already occurred in recent years regarding renewables. Improving Pennsylvania’s business climate utilizing a free market is the best way to develop green energy technology and stimulate the Keystone economy.

(Reprinted with permission from Keystone Liberty and the author.)

Who's to blame for this?  How can a deficit ridden state government pass such legislation?  Simple, impose a new "fee" - a TAX - so we all have to pay for such schemes.  Who is to blame for this Big Government, taxpayer funded, Green Energy initiative?  Here is a list of sponsors from H.B. 1580 (Republicans in red, Democrats in blue):

INTRODUCED BY ROSS, SCAVELLO, THOMAS, BISHOP, BOYD, B. BOYLE, K. BOYLE, BRADFORD, BRENNAN, BRIGGS, R. BROWN, V. BROWN, CALTAGIRONE, CARROLL, COHEN, D. COSTA, CREIGHTON, CURRY, CUTLER, DALEY, DAVIS, DAY, DEASY, DeLUCA, DePASQUALE, DiGIROLAMO, DONATUCCI, J. EVANS, EVERETT, FARRY, FLECK, FRANKEL, FREEMAN, GALLOWAY, GEORGE, GIBBONS, GILLEN, GINGRICH, GOODMAN, HACKETT, HAHN, HANNA, HARHAI, HARKINS, HARPER, HARRIS, HELM, HENNESSEY, HESS, HORNAMAN, JOSEPHS, KAVULICH, F. KELLER, M. K. KELLER, W. KELLER, KILLION, KOTIK, KULA, MAJOR, MALONEY, MANN, MASSER, MATZIE, McGEEHAN, MICCARELLI, MILLARD, MILNE, MOUL, MUNDY, MURPHY, MURT, NEUMAN, M. O'BRIEN, O'NEILL, PASHINSKI, PAYTON, PEIFER, PETRI, PRESTON, READSHAW, REICHLEY, ROEBUCK, SABATINA, SAMUELSON, SANTARSIERO, SANTONI, SAYLOR, SCHRODER, SHAPIRO, K. SMITH, M. SMITH, STABACK, STERN, STURLA, TAYLOR, TOBASH, TOOHIL, VEREB, VITALI, VULAKOVICH, WAGNER, WATSON, WHITE, YOUNGBLOOD, QUINN, ROCK AND SONNEY, OCTOBER 20, 2011

Find your State Representative

Contact your State Representative

More news:

PA ratepayers could pay more to salvage solar industry

‘Green Jobs’ scam much bigger than Solyndra

 

More Articles

do-you-have-the-stomach-for-it In the musical “1776” a new delegate arrives at the Continental Congress – Dr. Lyman Hull from Georgia.  He is besieged with questions about his position on independence.  At one point, he states that he is able to vote his “own personal convictions”.  When asked what they are, he shrewdly replies,...
happy-4th-2014 Philadelphia July 3d. 1776 Had a Declaration of Independency been made seven Months ago, it would have been attended with many great and glorious Effects.  We might before this Hour, have formed Alliances with foreign States. -- We should have mastered Quebec and been in Possession of Canada.  You...

Follow Us via

Featured Videos

National Debt Clock

Who's Online

We have 8 guests and no members online

New Members

  • writhebcuamo
  • seoden4k
  • joomadnin
  • elviradir20
  • machiness